Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Beam v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-00083-MR. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180518c79 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: May 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte . On March 29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed her Complaint and a Motion to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Docs. 1, 2]. On April 11, 2018, the Court denied the Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and gave the Plaintiff thirty (30) days to pay the required filing fee for this action. [Doc. 3]. In the Order, the Court warned the Plaintiff th
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte.

On March 29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed her Complaint and a Motion to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Docs. 1, 2]. On April 11, 2018, the Court denied the Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and gave the Plaintiff thirty (30) days to pay the required filing fee for this action. [Doc. 3]. In the Order, the Court warned the Plaintiff that failure to pay the required filing fee within thirty (30) days of the entry of the Order denying her application would result in the dismissal of this action. [Id.].

More than thirty (30) days have now passed since the entry of the Court's Order denying the Plaintiff's Application, and the Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as required.

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer