Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Bradley, 1:15CR00096-1 (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20170202e34 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT (Financial Litigation Unit) DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Answer of Garnishee, filed on November 16, 2016 (Docket #30) by the Garnishee, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians ("Tribe"), and the Response of the United States filed on November 17, 2016 (Docket #31). On May 19, 2016, the Honorable Martin Reidinger, United States District Judge, sentenced Defendant to serve 120 months imprisonment and 3 years probation
More

ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT

(Financial Litigation Unit)

This matter is before the Court on the Answer of Garnishee, filed on November 16, 2016 (Docket #30) by the Garnishee, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians ("Tribe"), and the Response of the United States filed on November 17, 2016 (Docket #31).

On May 19, 2016, the Honorable Martin Reidinger, United States District Judge, sentenced Defendant to serve 120 months imprisonment and 3 years probation for her convictions for assault with intent to commit murder within Indian Country, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(1) and 1153. See Judgment (Docket #23). As part of the Judgment, Defendant was ordered to pay a $100.00 criminal assessment and restitution of $114,828.84 to the estate of her victims. Subsequently, the United States sought to garnish Defendant's gaming per capita gaming revenue. On October 31, 2016 (Docket #26), the Court entered a Writ of Continuing Garnishment as to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. The United States is entitled to garnish the per capita payments and has satisfied the prerequisites set forth in 15 U.S.C. § 1673 and other applicable statutes.

The Tribe filed an answer on November 16, 2016 (Docket #30) setting forth objections and defenses to the Government's right to garnish. On the basis of those objections, the Tribe requested this Court quash the government's garnishment.

The Tribe objected to the garnishment on the basis that any garnishment order in this action should be enforced through the Cherokee Court to ensure proper allocation of garnishment distributions. There is no legal authority cited in support of the Tribe's request. Any and all funds collected by the government are sent directly to the Clerk of Court, as is required, so that the Clerk may distribute the funds in accordance with applicable law and as ordered in each criminal judgment. There is no provision that allows the Tribe to distribute funds collected by, or on behalf of, the government, victims, or other entities. To do so would violate the statutory structure of criminal judgments, restitution, the Mandatory Victim Rights Act, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The government is not permitted to cede its collection and distribution authority to the Tribe. This Court agrees that all funds collected by the government in all its criminal cases are properly allocated, including those collected from garnished per capita distributions, as they are distributed in accordance with applicable statutes and in accordance with the criminal judgments entered by the Court. The methods currently in place are effective, accurate, appropriate, and most importantly, compliant with the applicable laws.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Tribe's objections, defenses, or set-offs and its motion to quash be overruled and denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an Order of Garnishment is hereby ENTERED in the amount of $114,928.84, computed through October 31, 2016, which attaches to each per capita distribution of gaming revenues and that all said per capita distributions be garnished in favor of the United States until Defendant's assessment and restitution debt are paid in full.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer