U.S. v. JACKSON, 06-CR-478 (ADS). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20120221966
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge. On November 30, 2011, the Defendant William Jackson filed a motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and United States Sentencing Guidelines 1B1.10. The Government has responded to this motion as to why the Court should not issue an amended judgment reducing the Defendant's term of imprisonment. In short, the Government claims that because the Defendant was sentenced as a career offender, he is not entitled to be resentenced in
Summary: ORDER ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge. On November 30, 2011, the Defendant William Jackson filed a motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and United States Sentencing Guidelines 1B1.10. The Government has responded to this motion as to why the Court should not issue an amended judgment reducing the Defendant's term of imprisonment. In short, the Government claims that because the Defendant was sentenced as a career offender, he is not entitled to be resentenced in ..
More
ORDER
ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge.
On November 30, 2011, the Defendant William Jackson filed a motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and United States Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.10. The Government has responded to this motion as to why the Court should not issue an amended judgment reducing the Defendant's term of imprisonment. In short, the Government claims that because the Defendant was sentenced as a career offender, he is not entitled to be resentenced in this case.
Tracey E. Gaffey, Esq. has agreed to represent the Defendant in this matter. Therefore, any response to the Government's submission shall be filed on or before March 8, 2012. Any reply by the Government shall be filed on or before March 19, 2012.
The United States Department of Probation is directed to obtain all records regarding the Defendant's behavior during his current term of incarceration and produce all such records to this Court on or before March 19, 2012. Further, the Probation Department is requested to submit any amendments to the Defendant's pre-sentence report on or before March 19, 2012.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
