Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sincavage v. Schott North America, 3:18-CV-01231. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181009d45 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO , District Judge . NOW , this 5th day of October, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Schott North America (Doc. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part . (A) Counts Three, Four, and Five of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Schott North America. (B) The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. (2) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Eric Urruti (Doc. 24) is DENIED . (3) The Mot
More

ORDER

NOW, this 5th day of October, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Schott North America (Doc. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

(A) Counts Three, Four, and Five of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Schott North America. (B) The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

(2) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Eric Urruti (Doc. 24) is DENIED.

(3) The Motion to Sever filed by Defendant Schott North America (Doc. 29) is DENIED.

(4) The Motion to Strike Returns of Service, filed by Schott A.G. (Doc. 31), construed as a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), is DENIED.

(5) The Motion for Alternative Service filed by Plaintiffs Amy Sincavage and Michael Wisniewski (Doc. 34) is DENIED.

(6) The Motion to Strike affidavits and returns of service, filed by Schott A.G. (Doc. 49), is DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer