U.S. v. Prado, 7:12-CR-88-BO-6. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180925d69
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant's pro se motion to be relocated to a residential reentry center (RRC) in South Carolina. [DE 440]. Exclusive authority over a federal prisoner's place of imprisonment is vested in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. 18 U.S.C. 3621(b). While 18 U.S.C. 3624 expands the Bureau's authority to place prisoners in RRCs, it does not give the Court that authority. 18 U.S.C. 3624(c). Thus, the Court lacks the
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant's pro se motion to be relocated to a residential reentry center (RRC) in South Carolina. [DE 440]. Exclusive authority over a federal prisoner's place of imprisonment is vested in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. 18 U.S.C. 3621(b). While 18 U.S.C. 3624 expands the Bureau's authority to place prisoners in RRCs, it does not give the Court that authority. 18 U.S.C. 3624(c). Thus, the Court lacks the a..
More
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's pro se motion to be relocated to a residential reentry center (RRC) in South Carolina. [DE 440]. Exclusive authority over a federal prisoner's place of imprisonment is vested in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b). While 18 U.S.C. § 3624 expands the Bureau's authority to place prisoners in RRCs, it does not give the Court that authority. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c). Thus, the Court lacks the authority to direct the Bureau of Prisons to allow defendant to serve his sentence in a particular RRC, whether in South Carolina or not, and the motion is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
