Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, CV-16-52-GF-BMM. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20161014e65 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER BRIAN MORRIS , District Judge . Applicant for intervention, National Association of Clean Water Agencies, filed its motion pursuant to Rule 24, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to intervene in the above-captioned case. As set forth in its motion and brief in support of its unopposed motion to intervene as an Intervenor-Defendant, the Applicant meets the standard for intervention as of right, or, in the alternative, permissive intervention. Plaintiff, Defendants EPA and Gina McCarthy,
More

ORDER

Applicant for intervention, National Association of Clean Water Agencies, filed its motion pursuant to Rule 24, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to intervene in the above-captioned case. As set forth in its motion and brief in support of its unopposed motion to intervene as an Intervenor-Defendant, the Applicant meets the standard for intervention as of right, or, in the alternative, permissive intervention. Plaintiff, Defendants EPA and Gina McCarthy, and Intervenor-Defendants Treasure State Resources Assoc. of Montana, MDEQ, and Montana League of Cities and Towns oppose NACWA's intervention in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED that the unopposed motion for intervention of Applicant, National Association of Clean Water Agencies is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the National Association of Clean Water Agencies Interveners shall file their answer (Doc. 41-3) and motions to appear pro hac vice (Docs. 41-4, 41-7 and 41-10) separately, not as attachments to their motion to intervene and in compliance with Local Rules of the District of Montana.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer