FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.

I. Synopsis

Defendant Jittawee Bear Cub (Bear Cub) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Bear Cub admitted all of the alleged violations. Bear Cub's supervised release should be revoked. Bear Cub should be placed in custody for 6 months, with a lifetime of supervised release to follow. The sentence imposed in this case should run concurrent with the sentences imposed in Causes CR 07-117-GF-BMM and CR 18-83-GF-BMM.

II. Status

Bear Cub was found guilty of Abusive Sexual Contact following a jury trial on August 10, 2005. (Doc. 42). The Court sentenced Bear Cub to 41 months of custody, followed by a life term of supervised release. (Doc. 54). Bear Cub's current term of supervised release began on November 1, 2019. (Doc. 82 at 2).

Petition

The United States Probation Office filed a Petition on December 11, 2019, requesting that the Court revoke Bear Cub's supervised release. (Doc. 82). The Petition alleges that Bear Cub violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by failing to report for substance abuse testing; 2) by failing to report for substance abuse treatment; 3) by failing to report for sex offender treatment; 3) by failing to report to his probation officer as directed; and 5) by failing to inform his probation officer of his current residence.

Initial appearance

Bear Cub appeared before the undersigned for his initial appearance on January 14, 2020. Bear Cub was represented by counsel. Bear Cub stated that he had read the petition and that he understood the allegations. Bear Cub waived his right to a preliminary hearing. The parties consented to proceed with the revocation hearing before the undersigned.

Revocation hearing

The Court conducted a joint revocation hearing on January 14, 2020, for this case, Cause CR 07-117-GF-BMM and Cause CR 18-83-GF-BMM. Bear Cub admitted that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by failing to report for substance abuse testing; 2) by failing to report for substance abuse treatment; 3) by failing to report for sex offender treatment; 3) by failing to report to his probation officer as directed; and 5) by failing to inform his probation officer of his current residence. The violations are serious and warrant revocation of Bear Cub's supervised release.

Bear Cub's violations are Grade C violations. Bear Cub's criminal history category is I. Bear Cub's underlying offense in this case is a Class C felony. Bear Cub's underlying offense in Cause CR 07-117-GF-BMM is a Class A felony. Bear Cub's underlying offense in Cause CR 18-83-GF-BMM is a Class D felony. Bear Cub could be incarcerated for up to 24 months. He could be ordered to remain on supervised release for up to life, less any custody time imposed. The United States Sentencing Guidelines call for a term of custody of 3 to 9 months in this case.

III. Analysis

Bear Cub's supervised release should be revoked. Bear Cub should be incarcerated for 6 months, with a lifetime of supervised release to follow. This sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary. The sentence imposed in this case should run concurrent with the sentences imposed in Causes CR 07-117-GF-BMM and CR 18-83-GF-BMM.

IV. Conclusion

The Court informed Bear Cub that the above sentence would be recommended to United States District Judge Brian Morris. The Court also informed Bear Cub of his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their issuance. The Court explained to Bear Cub that Judge Morris would consider a timely objection before making a final determination on whether to revoke his supervised release and what, if any, sanction to impose. Bear Cub stated that he wished to waive his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations, and that he wished to waive his right to allocute before Judge Morris.

The Court FINDS:

The Court RECOMMENDS:

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT

The parties may serve and file written objections to the Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their entry, as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A United States district judge will make a de novo determination regarding any portion of the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the Findings and Recommendations. Failure to timely file written objections may bar a de novo determination by the district judge, and may waive the right to appear and allocute before a district judge.