Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SPRIGGS v. SHANLIAN, 12-14918. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20140512d90 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: CORRECTED ORDER: (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [56], (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS SHANLIAN'S, KRISH'S, WITTHUHN'S, AND SHELTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS [33]; (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT SCHREIBER'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [37]; GRANTING DEFENDANT MERRILL'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [38]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT GAUTHIER'S MOTION TO DISMISS [48] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court o
More

CORRECTED ORDER: (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [56], (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS SHANLIAN'S, KRISH'S, WITTHUHN'S, AND SHELTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS [33]; (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT SCHREIBER'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [37]; GRANTING DEFENDANT MERRILL'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [38]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT GAUTHIER'S MOTION TO DISMISS [48]

NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 56]. Being fully advised in the premises and having read the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiffs' Objections, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [33] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

(a) GRANTED as to Defendants Krish, Witthuhn, Shelton, and Nuckolls and all Plaintiffs' claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

(b) GRANTED as to Defendant Shanlian regarding the claims of entry onto the property to view the license plate, removal of the air conditioner, and the pointing of a firearm through the window;

(c) GRANTED as to Defendant Shanlian regarding all claims by Plaintiffs Cassandra Ross and Eric Spriggs; and

(d) DENIED as to Defendant Shanlian regarding Plaintiff Keith Spriggs' Fourth Amendment claim based on entry into and search of the residence.

2. Defendant Schreiber's motion for judgment on the pleadings [37] is GRANTED;

3. Defendant Merrill's motion for judgment on the pleadings [38] is GRANTED;

4. Defendant Gauthier's motion to dismiss [48] is GRANTED; and

5. All of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Schreiber, Merrill, Piercy, and Gauthier are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer