Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. v. IREX CONTRACTING GROUP, 16-2499. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20171222h79 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH T. HEY , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff's motion to compel production of additional financial information (Doc. 256), the response (Doc. 258), and after having reviewed the deposition of Jason Dodd, Irex's Controller, and the transcript of the oral argument from October 20, 2017 (Doc. 241), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is DENIED. IT IS FURT
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff's motion to compel production of additional financial information (Doc. 256), the response (Doc. 258), and after having reviewed the deposition of Jason Dodd, Irex's Controller, and the transcript of the oral argument from October 20, 2017 (Doc. 241), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon consideration of Defendant's motion to mark the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Jason Dodd complete (Doc. 255), the response (Doc. 259), and the deposition of Mr. Dodd, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. However, in light of the deposition transcript and Brand's counsel's representation that she needed only an additional two to three hours, the court limits any further deposition of Mr. Dodd to four hours.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer