Filed: Jan. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE M. McKENNA, District Judge. The above defendant was sentenced, on April 14, 1994, to 360 months of imprisonment on Counts 1-6, 8 & 17 of the indictment, 240 months of imprisonment on Counts 13-15, to run concurrently with the 360 months, and 60 months on Counts 7, 9 and 10, to run consecutively to the 360 months. (Judgment at 2.) He was sentenced to 4 years of supervised release. ( Id. at 3.) Defendant moves, pro se , pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, for a corr
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE M. McKENNA, District Judge. The above defendant was sentenced, on April 14, 1994, to 360 months of imprisonment on Counts 1-6, 8 & 17 of the indictment, 240 months of imprisonment on Counts 13-15, to run concurrently with the 360 months, and 60 months on Counts 7, 9 and 10, to run consecutively to the 360 months. (Judgment at 2.) He was sentenced to 4 years of supervised release. ( Id. at 3.) Defendant moves, pro se , pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, for a corre..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAWRENCE M. McKENNA, District Judge.
The above defendant was sentenced, on April 14, 1994, to 360 months of imprisonment on Counts 1-6, 8 & 17 of the indictment, 240 months of imprisonment on Counts 13-15, to run concurrently with the 360 months, and 60 months on Counts 7, 9 and 10, to run consecutively to the 360 months. (Judgment at 2.) He was sentenced to 4 years of supervised release. (Id. at 3.)
Defendant moves, pro se, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, for a correction of his sentence.1
At sentencing, the Court imposed a four-year term of supervised release without indicating the count or counts to which the supervised release related. (Transcript, April 14, 1994, at 6.) The judgment reflects the imposition of that term of supervised release, not indicated to relate to any count or counts. (Judgment at 3.)
Defendant, in his motion, argues that the judgment should be corrected by an indication therein of the count to which the supervised release term pertains.
In the alternative, in a reply letter dated December 26, 2011, defendant asks that the judgment be amended in the description of the "Nature of Offense" as to Counts 2-6 and 8. He points out that "possession of a firearm" does not, standing alone, describe the offense in question. (Letter, Def. to Court, Dec. 26, 2011, at 2.)
The motion is denied in both respects.
The "lumping together" of the supervised release term without identification to particular counts is not improper in the Second Circuit, see Santana-Madera v. United States, 260 F.3d 133, 137 (2d Cir. 2001). Nor is it prejudicial. Count 1, by itself, carried with it a term of supervised release of four years. (See Presentence Report, June 28, 1993 [Ex. B to Gov't Letter Mem. dated Dec. 19, 2001)] at 17 ¶ 91 [citing 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)]).
The identification of Counts 7, 9 & 10 as "Possession of Firearm" does not require amendment, because that shorthand description is accompanied by the citation of the specific statute violated, 28 U.S.C. § 924(c).
The motion is denied.
SO ORDERED.
