Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, 00-11047 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 00-11047 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-11047 _ D.C. Docket No. 98-01719-CV-N-S MAJOR SAXTON, JR., MARY SAXTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (Opinion January 24, 2001, 239 F.3d . 1209, 11th Cir., 2001) (March 15, 2001) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circui
More
                      IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                               FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                              ________________________________

                                        No. 00-11047
                              ________________________________

                                D.C. Docket No. 98-01719-CV-N-S


MAJOR SAXTON, JR., MARY SAXTON,

                                                       Plaintiffs-Appellants,

               versus

ACF INDUSTRIES, INC.,

                                                       Defendant-Appellee.

        _________________________________________________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Alabama
        _________________________________________________________________

                  (Opinion January 24, 2001, 239 F.3d . 1209, 11th Cir., 2001)

                                          (March 15, 2001)


Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK,
CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

               A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor

of granting a rehearing en banc,

               IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer