WALDEN v. PFIZER, INC., 3:11-CV-540-GCM. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120601c27
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Motion for Reconsideration for Motion for Appointment of Counsel [doc. 20]. Plaintiff's Motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED and Plaintiff has until June 22, 2012 to file her response to the Motion to Dismiss. The Court suggests that Plaintiff try to find pro bono legal services to assist in this matter. As the Court does
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Motion for Reconsideration for Motion for Appointment of Counsel [doc. 20]. Plaintiff's Motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED and Plaintiff has until June 22, 2012 to file her response to the Motion to Dismiss. The Court suggests that Plaintiff try to find pro bono legal services to assist in this matter. As the Court does ..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Motion for Reconsideration for Motion for Appointment of Counsel [doc. 20].
Plaintiff's Motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED and Plaintiff has until June 22, 2012 to file her response to the Motion to Dismiss.
The Court suggests that Plaintiff try to find pro bono legal services to assist in this matter. As the Court does not have funds available for use in appointing counsel for pro se cases, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
