DESHIELD v. SDH EDUCATION EAST, LLC, 13-1945. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20131021096
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Joana Deshield appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in her employment discrimination action. Deshield's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Deshield that failure to file timely objections to the recommendation could waive appellate review of a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Joana Deshield appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in her employment discrimination action. Deshield's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Deshield that failure to file timely objections to the recommendation could waive appellate review of a d..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Joana Deshield appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in her employment discrimination action. Deshield's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Deshield that failure to file timely objections to the recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Deshield has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Deshield's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
