SPURGEON v. THE NJ STATE POLICE, 12-3352 (WJM). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20141217d25
Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge. A Report and Recommendation ("the R&R") was filed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on November 12, 2014 recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b) be granted. Plaintiff filed informal objections to the R&R on November 24, 2014 and Defendants filed their response on December 1, 2014. After careful consideration of the parties' submissions and a de novo review of the R&R, and good c
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge. A Report and Recommendation ("the R&R") was filed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on November 12, 2014 recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b) be granted. Plaintiff filed informal objections to the R&R on November 24, 2014 and Defendants filed their response on December 1, 2014. After careful consideration of the parties' submissions and a de novo review of the R&R, and good ca..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge.
A Report and Recommendation ("the R&R") was filed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on November 12, 2014 recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b) be granted. Plaintiff filed informal objections to the R&R on November 24, 2014 and Defendants filed their response on December 1, 2014. After careful consideration of the parties' submissions and a de novo review of the R&R, and good cause appearing,
IT IS on this 16th day of December 2014, hereby
ORDERED that the R&R is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle