U.S. v. McCorey, 3:18-cr-118-MOC-DCK-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190701b78
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Ex Parte Motion for Additional Funds for Services of a Private Investigator. (Doc. No. 36). In reviewing Defendant's motion, the Court finds that it appears that Defendant inadvertently failed to include the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator in the motion. Defendant shall, therefore, resubmit an amended motion, including in it the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator.
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Ex Parte Motion for Additional Funds for Services of a Private Investigator. (Doc. No. 36). In reviewing Defendant's motion, the Court finds that it appears that Defendant inadvertently failed to include the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator in the motion. Defendant shall, therefore, resubmit an amended motion, including in it the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator. I..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Ex Parte Motion for Additional Funds for Services of a Private Investigator. (Doc. No. 36).
In reviewing Defendant's motion, the Court finds that it appears that Defendant inadvertently failed to include the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator in the motion. Defendant shall, therefore, resubmit an amended motion, including in it the proposed hourly rate for the private investigator.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
