Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harper v. Lemon, 3:14-cv-182-FDW. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160211c95 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appropriate Motions, (Doc. No. 30), on Plaintiff's Motion for Disclosure of Impeachment Information, (Doc. No. 31), and on Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. No. 32). First, as to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appropriate Motions, (Doc. No. 30), the parties shall have thirty additional days in which to file dispositive motions in
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appropriate Motions, (Doc. No. 30), on Plaintiff's Motion for Disclosure of Impeachment Information, (Doc. No. 31), and on Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. No. 32).

First, as to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appropriate Motions, (Doc. No. 30), the parties shall have thirty additional days in which to file dispositive motions in this action. Thus, dispositive motions shall be due on or before April 11, 2016.

Next, as to Plaintiff's Motion for Disclosure of Impeachment Information, the motion is denied. Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2 and the Court's scheduling order entered on October 14, 2015, all discovery requests in this matter are to be served on the parties, and discovery requests are not to be filed with the Court. (Doc. No. 25 at 2). Thus, Plaintiff shall serve his discovery requests on Defendants.

Finally, as to Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, Plaintiff's motion is denied for the same reasons the Court has denied his prior motions to appoint counsel. See (Doc. Nos. 8; 19).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appropriate Motions, (Doc. No. 30), Plaintiff's Motion for Disclosure of Impeachment Information, (Doc. No. 31), and Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. No. 32), are DENIED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer