U.S. v. LAIL, 1:10cr68. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120312768
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33]. For the reasons stated in the Government's Motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33] is GRANTED, and Counts Two, Three, and Four of the Bill of Indictment in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to prepare an Amended Judgme
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33]. For the reasons stated in the Government's Motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33] is GRANTED, and Counts Two, Three, and Four of the Bill of Indictment in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to prepare an Amended Judgmen..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33].
For the reasons stated in the Government's Motion, and for cause shown,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 33] is GRANTED, and Counts Two, Three, and Four of the Bill of Indictment in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to prepare an Amended Judgment ordering forfeiture in this case in accordance with the Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture [Doc. 32] previously entered herein and dismissing Counts Two, Three, and Four of the Bill of Indictment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
