Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Optima Tobacco Corporation v. U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc., 5:16-CV-889-D. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190829a19 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On August 20, 2019, Magistrate Judge Gates granted in part and denied in part defendants' motions to seal [D.E. 95, 103] and directed defendants to file either a proposed redacted version of defendants' memoranda of law in support of their motions for summary judgment with a motion to seal or the unredacted memoranda as public documents [D.E. 108]. On August 27, 2019, defendants filed proposed redacted memoranda [D.E. 109], moved to maintain the
More

ORDER

On August 20, 2019, Magistrate Judge Gates granted in part and denied in part defendants' motions to seal [D.E. 95, 103] and directed defendants to file either a proposed redacted version of defendants' memoranda of law in support of their motions for summary judgment with a motion to seal or the unredacted memoranda as public documents [D.E. 108]. On August 27, 2019, defendants filed proposed redacted memoranda [D.E. 109], moved to maintain the unredactedmemoranda under seal [D.E. 110], and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 111]. Plaintiff consents to defendants' motion to seal. See [D.E. 110] ¶ 13.

The court has considered the parties' filings under the governing standard. See Doe v. Pub. Citizen,749 F.3d 246, 265-66 (4th Cir. 2014). Consistently with Magistrate Judge Gates's order, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to seal [D.E. 11 O] and directs the clerk to maintain under seal the unredacted memoranda oflaw [D.E. 91-1, 93, 97-1, 100-1, 102]. The court shall consider those memoranda in ruling on defendants' motions for summary judgment, which remain pending.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer