Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JOHNSON, 1:09cr25-7. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20120522996 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 21, 2012
Latest Update: May 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se Motion to Quash [Doc. 341]. On June 4, 2009, the Defendant entered into a plea agreement with the Government pursuant to which she agreed to reimburse the Government for the cost of her court-appointed counsel. [Doc. 121]. The Judgment of Conviction entered on February 9, 2010 contains a requirement that the Defendant do so. [Doc. 258]. In this motion, the Defendant does not object to the Cou
More

ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se Motion to Quash [Doc. 341].

On June 4, 2009, the Defendant entered into a plea agreement with the Government pursuant to which she agreed to reimburse the Government for the cost of her court-appointed counsel. [Doc. 121]. The Judgment of Conviction entered on February 9, 2010 contains a requirement that the Defendant do so. [Doc. 258]. In this motion, the Defendant does not object to the Court's order that she reimburse the Government for those costs; she does, however, object to the amount thereof. [Doc. 341]. The Court has no authority to review, modify or amend the amount of attorney's fees ordered to be paid to the Defendant's court-appointed counsel. Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 & 36.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's pro se Motion to Quash [Doc. 341] is hereby DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer