TISCHLER v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., 3:13-cv-00282-RJC-DSC. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130628b79
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (document #4) concerning James T. Hedgepath, filed June 27, 2013. Mr. Hedgepath seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Suntrust Banks, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan. Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the Motion. In accordance with Rule 83.1(B) of this
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (document #4) concerning James T. Hedgepath, filed June 27, 2013. Mr. Hedgepath seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Suntrust Banks, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan. Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the Motion. In accordance with Rule 83.1(B) of this C..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (document #4) concerning James T. Hedgepath, filed June 27, 2013. Mr. Hedgepath seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Suntrust Banks, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan.
Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the Motion.
In accordance with Rule 83.1(B) of this Court's Local Rules, Mr. Hedgepath is admitted to appear before this Court pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant Suntrust Banks, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle