Dikambi v. City University of New York, 19-CV-9937 (RA). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200130d95
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . Plaintiff filed her Complaint with this Court on October 27, 2019 and a summons was issued for each Defendant on October 29, 2019. Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service stating that Defendant City University of New York was served with the Complaint and summons on January 7, 2020. Plaintiff, however, does not appear to have served the Complaint or summons on Defendant Adams. It is hereby: ORDERED that Plaintiff submit a letter to the Court by Februa
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . Plaintiff filed her Complaint with this Court on October 27, 2019 and a summons was issued for each Defendant on October 29, 2019. Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service stating that Defendant City University of New York was served with the Complaint and summons on January 7, 2020. Plaintiff, however, does not appear to have served the Complaint or summons on Defendant Adams. It is hereby: ORDERED that Plaintiff submit a letter to the Court by Februar..
More
ORDER
RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed her Complaint with this Court on October 27, 2019 and a summons was issued for each Defendant on October 29, 2019. Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service stating that Defendant City University of New York was served with the Complaint and summons on January 7, 2020. Plaintiff, however, does not appear to have served the Complaint or summons on Defendant Adams. It is hereby:
ORDERED that Plaintiff submit a letter to the Court by February 5, 2020 explaining why she failed to serve the summons and Complaint on Defendant Adams within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, if Plaintiff believes that Defendant Adams has been served, explaining when and in what manner such service was made.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Court does not receive a letter by February 5, 2020 showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the claims against Defendant Adams will be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
