Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. VON NotHAUS, 5:09CR27-RLV. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20151223g47 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DISMISSING IN PART PETITION OF JOSEPH F. SPECHT RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order (Doc. 270) affirming the jury's verdicts of guilty to Counts One, Two, and Three in the Superseding Bill of Indictment. WHEREAS, on February 25, 2015, the Court entered the Amended (Third) Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 297) forfeiting certain coins, metals, and other property to the United States.
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DISMISSING IN PART PETITION OF JOSEPH F. SPECHT

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order (Doc. 270) affirming the jury's verdicts of guilty to Counts One, Two, and Three in the Superseding Bill of Indictment.

WHEREAS, on February 25, 2015, the Court entered the Amended (Third) Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 297) forfeiting certain coins, metals, and other property to the United States.

WHEREAS, Petitioner Joseph F. Specht filed a Petition (Doc. 326) claiming ownership of fifty (50) one ounce copper Ron Paul coins, one (1) 2007 one ounce $20 silver Liberty coin, and one (1) one ounce defense silver Liberty coin.

WHEREAS, Petitioner's claim for fifty (50) one ounce copper Ron Paul coins is based on documentation and/or a plausible factual explanation that comports with the information known to the United States and Court, and that satisfies 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6), and the United States herein moves that the aforementioned portion be granted.

WHEREAS, Petitioner claims one (1) 2007 one ounce $20 silver Liberty coin, purchased in July of 2007 and the United States contends in its Motion that this property was previously finally forfeited to the United States as contraband per se.

WHEREAS, based on the evidence, the Court has ruled in this case that coins minted after the warning by the United States Mint to the Liberty dollar organization and the Defendant on September 14, 2006 were counterfeit. See Memorandum and Order, at 7 (Doc. 270; Memorandum and Order (First Preliminary Order of Forfeiture) at 18 (Doc. 285).

WHEREAS, the Court has ruled in this case that "Items that are considered `contraband' or `counterfeit' under Section 492 are deemed illegal per se and automatically forfeited without having to satisfy the otherwise applicable forfeiture procedures." Memorandum and Order (First Preliminary Order of Forfeiture) at 11 n. 10 (Doc. 285) (citing Helton v. Hunt, 330 F.3d 242, 247-48 (4th Cir. 2003)). The Court has further defined contraband in this case as "properties that no person or entity other than the United States may have a property right or interest in them." Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture, Doc. 296.

WHEREAS, the Petitioner also claims one (1) one ounce defense silver Liberty coin, which the United States has represented in its Motion that it does not have and such item was not included in the Third Preliminary Order.

IT IS THERFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Petition of Joseph F. Specht is granted in part, with said portion to be granted consisting of fifty (50) one ounce copper Ron Paul coins. This portion is granted based on information known to the United States and Court, and which satisfies 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6), and; 2. The Petition of Joseph F. Specht is dismissed in part, said portion to be dismissed consisting of the claim for one (1) 2007 one ounce $20 silver Liberty coin bearing the "Liberty" marking minted in November of 2007. Said coins have been determined to be contraband, and therefore this portion of the claim, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c)(1)(A) is dismissed for the reasons that the Petition fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and Petitioner does not have standing; 3. The Petition of Joseph F. Specht is denied in part, said portion to be denied consisting of the claim for one (1) one ounce defense silver Liberty coin. This portion of the Petitioner's claim is for items that were not forfeited to the United States, and therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c)(1)(A), this portion of the Petition is dismissed for the reason that the Petitioner fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and fails to assert standing. 4. Final disbursement by the United States shall be deferred until a comprehensive final order of forfeiture is entered in this case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer