Filed: Aug. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1, 2014 (#100), complaining that his sentence has run and that he has not been released because the judgment has not been signed. Such letters are moot because the judgment has this day been signed. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, to the extent defendant seeks relief, the two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1, 2014 (#100), complaining that his sentence has run and that he has not been released because the judgment has not been signed. Such letters are moot because the judgment has this day been signed. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, to the extent defendant seeks relief, the two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1,..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1, 2014 (#100), complaining that his sentence has run and that he has not been released because the judgment has not been signed. Such letters are moot because the judgment has this day been signed.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, to the extent defendant seeks relief, the two letters from defendant, received July 29, 2014 (#99) and August 1, 2014 (#100), are deemed MOOT.
