Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ballentine v. Three T Towing, LLC, 5:17-cv-00056-RJC-DSC. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190808c78 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Three T Towing, LLC's ("Defendant") Motion for Reconsideration of Contempt Sanction, (Doc. No. 32). For good cause shown, and noting that Plaintiff's counsel has not submitted a response in opposition, the Motion is GRANTED. The court is persuaded that Defendant's failure to comply with deadlines, although inexcusable, was aberrant, not likely to occur again, and to some extent invited by the
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Three T Towing, LLC's ("Defendant") Motion for Reconsideration of Contempt Sanction, (Doc. No. 32). For good cause shown, and noting that Plaintiff's counsel has not submitted a response in opposition, the Motion is GRANTED. The court is persuaded that Defendant's failure to comply with deadlines, although inexcusable, was aberrant, not likely to occur again, and to some extent invited by the failure of Plaintiff's counsel to prosecute its case.

Pursuant to Rules 37, 60, and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the inherent authority and power of the Court to grant the requested relief, the Court MODIFIES its oral order issued on April 24, 2019 imposing sanctions on defense counsel, and hereby RELEASES Defense counsel from having to pay any fine to the Court for his failure to comply with the Court's Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan. However, the Court notes that the sanction remains in effect for Plaintiff's counsel. SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer