Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. DAVIS, 1:00-cr-00006-MR-DLH-8. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20130612b49 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Probation or Supervised Release Term [Doc. 488]. Both counsel for the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer have advised the Court's chambers that they do not oppose the Defendant's Motion. Upon review of the Defendant's motion, and in light of the lack of opposition by the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer, the Court
More

ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Probation or Supervised Release Term [Doc. 488]. Both counsel for the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer have advised the Court's chambers that they do not oppose the Defendant's Motion.

Upon review of the Defendant's motion, and in light of the lack of opposition by the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer, the Court is satisfied that the early termination of the Defendant's supervised release is warranted by the Defendant's conduct and is in the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Probation or Supervised Release Term [Doc. 488] is GRANTED, and the Defendant's term of supervised release is hereby terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer