ORDER

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff American Development Group, LLC brought this diversity action against Defendants Island Robots of Florida ("Island Robots") and Teri Louise Capo, alleging various causes of action arising from a contract between the parties. (See Second Am. Compl. "SAC" (Dkt. 39).) Pursuant to this contract, Defendants were to provide Plaintiff with a robotic "Parking Garage Attendant" for use at the grand opening of a parking garage owned by Plaintiff. (Id.) The robot failed to perform as guaranteed by Defendants, however, and Defendants refused to accept return of the robot or to refund Plaintiff.1 (Id.)

Upon Plaintiff's application and in light of Defendant's failure to appear in or otherwise defend this action, the Clerk of the Court entered Defendant's default on October 11, 2017. (Entry of Default (Dkt. 26).) Currently pending before the court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Pl. Mot. for Default J. ("Mot.") (Dkt. 57).) The undersigned referred Plaintiff's motion to Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo, who issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") that the court grant the motion in part and award damages. (R&R (Dkt. 66) at 1.)

In her R&R, Judge Kuo first found that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the federal diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because there is diversity of citizenship between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. (R&R at 9 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1)).) Judge Kuo next determined that the court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because Ms. Capo, despite her efforts to evade service, was properly served under Florida law.2 (Id. at 10-12.) As to the merits, Judge Kuo applied New York law to determine that Plaintiff had adequately established its breach of contract and fraud claims (id. at 13-17), but that it had not established its breach of warranty claim (id. at 17-19). Finally, Judge Kuo found that Plaintiff had sufficiently stated a violation of New York's False Advertising Law, General Business Law § 350. (R&R at 19-21.)

No party has objected to Judge Kuo's R&R,3 and the time in which to do so has passed, see Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM) (JO), 2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F.Supp.2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having found no clear error, the court ADOPTS IN FULL the R&R and GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. The court finds Defendants liable for Plaintiff's causes of action for fraud, breach of contract, and false advertising under G.B.L. § 350. Defendant is not liable as to Plaintiff's cause of action for violations of the Uniform Commercial Code.

For the foregoing reasons, and for the additional reasons laid out by Judge Kuo (see R&R at 21-27), Plaintiff is awarded damages as follows:

The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to pro se Defendant Teri Louise Capo.

SO ORDERED.