Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BEDDINGFIELD, 3:12cr369-RJC. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150123f56 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2014
Summary: AMENDED CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2) ROBERT J. CONRAD, District Judge. BASED UPON the Defendant's plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following is subject to forfeiture, and that thi
More

AMENDED CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2)

ROBERT J. CONRAD, District Judge.

BASED UPON the Defendant's plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following is subject to forfeiture, and that this Amended Order supersedes and replaces the more general Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture (Doc. 45) already issued in this case on July 1, 2013:

1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981 and 982, 21 U.S.C. § 853 and/or 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is subject to any and all third party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication herein:

• A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $60,000, such amount constituting the proceeds of the Count One offense set forth in the Second Superseding Bill of Indictment; and • $12,000 in funds paid by Defendant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or United States Marshals Service at or before sentencing in this matter.

2. If and to the extent required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6), 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), and/or other applicable law, the United States shall publish notice and provide direct written notice of forfeiture.

3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), upon entry of this order, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate, or dispose of the property, including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents, and to issue subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.

4. A forfeiture money judgment shall be included in the defendant's sentence, and the United States may take steps to collect the judgment from any property of the defendant, provided, the value of any forfeited specific assets shall be credited toward satisfaction of this money judgment upon liquidation.

The parties stipulate and agree that the aforementioned assets constitute property derived from or traceable to proceeds of defendant's crime herein and are therefore subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981 and 982, 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and/or 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). The defendant hereby waives the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment against defendant. If the defendant has previously submitted a claim in response to an administrative forfeiture proceeding regarding any of this property, defendant hereby withdraws that claim. If defendant has not previously submitted such a claim, defendant hereby waives all right to do so.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer