WALSH v. MacKEY, 1:11-CV-321-MR-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120604730
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) filed March 23, 2012. "Plaintiffs' Motion In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 26) was filed on April 20, 2012. Defendants have failed to file a reply brief, or notice of intent not to file a reply, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(E). Under these circumstances, the Court will require Defendants to file a reply br
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) filed March 23, 2012. "Plaintiffs' Motion In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 26) was filed on April 20, 2012. Defendants have failed to file a reply brief, or notice of intent not to file a reply, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(E). Under these circumstances, the Court will require Defendants to file a reply bri..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) filed March 23, 2012. "Plaintiffs' Motion In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 26) was filed on April 20, 2012. Defendants have failed to file a reply brief, or notice of intent not to file a reply, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(E).
Under these circumstances, the Court will require Defendants to file a reply brief in support of their "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) addressing Plaintiffs' arguments in the response, including the contention that Defendants "have failed to file a responsive pleading as to their individual and/or private capacities." (Document No. 26, p.1).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of their "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) on or before June 11, 2012.
Source: Leagle
