Vinson v. U.S., 1:12-cr-00020-MR-5. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190610d56
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Release of CJA-20 [Doc. 22]. The Petitioner moves for the documents containing the narrative billing records submitted by Petitioner's trial counsel in support of a Criminal Justice Act Form 20 voucher payment (hereinafter "CJA-20") for the period of August 2, 2012 to October 20, 2013. [Doc. 22]. The Petitioner argues that the documents containing these narrative billing records may conta
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Release of CJA-20 [Doc. 22]. The Petitioner moves for the documents containing the narrative billing records submitted by Petitioner's trial counsel in support of a Criminal Justice Act Form 20 voucher payment (hereinafter "CJA-20") for the period of August 2, 2012 to October 20, 2013. [Doc. 22]. The Petitioner argues that the documents containing these narrative billing records may contai..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Release of CJA-20 [Doc. 22].
The Petitioner moves for the documents containing the narrative billing records submitted by Petitioner's trial counsel in support of a Criminal Justice Act Form 20 voucher payment (hereinafter "CJA-20") for the period of August 2, 2012 to October 20, 2013. [Doc. 22]. The Petitioner argues that the documents containing these narrative billing records may contain information relevant and material to the issues set for the evidentiary hearing in this matter. [See id. at 2-3].
The documents containing the detail supporting the CJA-20 in question were processed by the Office of the Federal Defenders and the District Court for this District. Because Circuit approval was also required, such documents were also forwarded to the Forth Circuit Court of Appeals. After diligent search of the records of the Federal Defenders Office, the District Court and the Court of Appeals, no copy of such documents can be located. As such, the relief sought by the Petitioner cannot be granted, thus rendering Petitioner's motion moot.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Release of CJA-20 [Doc. 22], is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
