U.S. v. JACKSON, 3:90-cr-00085-MOC. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150615875
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony. Having considered government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony (#134) is GRANTED , and the government is granted leave to serve certain defendants who are now petitioners in collateral
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony. Having considered government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony (#134) is GRANTED , and the government is granted leave to serve certain defendants who are now petitioners in collateral j..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony. Having considered government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that government's Motion to Permit Limited Disclosure of Grand Jury Testimony (#134) is GRANTED, and the government is granted leave to serve certain defendants who are now petitioners in collateral judicial proceedings with the proposed page of Elliot Alexander's testimony as the court finds that such testimony is relevant to an issue raised in those proceedings and that disclosure would further the interest of justice, all in accordance with Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Source: Leagle
