Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Eisenbach v. Ernst & Young U.S. LLP, 18-1679. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181019n29 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW , this 15 th day of October, 2018, upon a review of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF 5), Plaintiff's Response thereto (ECF 6), and Defendant's reply thereto (ECF 7), and for the reasons set out in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED . It is further ORDERED that all proceedings are STAYED until further Order of the Court as follows: 1. The case shall be transferred to the
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2018, upon a review of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF 5), Plaintiff's Response thereto (ECF 6), and Defendant's reply thereto (ECF 7), and for the reasons set out in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that all proceedings are STAYED until further Order of the Court as follows:

1. The case shall be transferred to the Civil Suspense File; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes; 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the case and the case shall be returned to the Court's active docket in 365 days or upon further order of the Court; 4. Counsel shall provide a written status report to the Court every six (6) months; and 5. The entry of this Order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer