Corona v. City of Clovis, 17-805 JCH/CG. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20190711c06
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Jorge Corona's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority ("Motion to Extend"), (Doc. 77), filed July 10, 2019. In his Motion to Extend, Mr. Corona asks the Court for an extension of time to file his response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority, (Doc. 74), filed June 28, 2019. (Doc. 77 at 1). Mr. Coron
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Jorge Corona's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority ("Motion to Extend"), (Doc. 77), filed July 10, 2019. In his Motion to Extend, Mr. Corona asks the Court for an extension of time to file his response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority, (Doc. 74), filed June 28, 2019. (Doc. 77 at 1). Mr. Corona..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CARMEN E. GARZA, Chief Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Jorge Corona's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority ("Motion to Extend"), (Doc. 77), filed July 10, 2019. In his Motion to Extend, Mr. Corona asks the Court for an extension of time to file his response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority, (Doc. 74), filed June 28, 2019. (Doc. 77 at 1). Mr. Corona explains that "[d]ue to the expiration of the ordered time which Plaintiff had to file a Response, Plaintiff did not attempt to obtain approval from Defendants' counsel." Id. at 2.
Mr. Corona's failure to seek concurrence from opposing counsel is a violation of Local Rule 7.1. D.N.M. LR-CIV 7.1(a) ("Movant must determine whether a motion is opposed, and a motion that omits recitation of a good-faith request for concurrence may be summarily denied."). As such, Mr. Corona's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority, (Doc. 77), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
