MEADOWS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 5:11-CV-143-RLV-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120113611
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation's Unopposed Motion To Stay All Proceedings" (Document No. 10) filed January 9, 2012. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation's Unopposed Motion To Stay All Proceedings" (Document No. 10) filed January 9, 2012. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation's Unopposed Motion To Stay All Proceedings" (Document No. 10) filed January 9, 2012. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation's Unopposed Motion To Stay All Proceedings" (Document No. 10) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report, jointly if possible, on or before March 1, 2012.
Source: Leagle
