BURGESS v. U.S., 1:12-cv-375. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150210975
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 84). On January 20, 2015, the Court denied by written order Petitioner's Motion for Recusal. ( See Doc. No. 81). Petitioner now asks the Court to reconsider that ruling, but provides no additional evidence or reasoning to support the motion. In fact, it appears that the motion simply rehashes the same contentions in his original motion for recusal, which the Court rej
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 84). On January 20, 2015, the Court denied by written order Petitioner's Motion for Recusal. ( See Doc. No. 81). Petitioner now asks the Court to reconsider that ruling, but provides no additional evidence or reasoning to support the motion. In fact, it appears that the motion simply rehashes the same contentions in his original motion for recusal, which the Court reje..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 84). On January 20, 2015, the Court denied by written order Petitioner's Motion for Recusal. (See Doc. No. 81). Petitioner now asks the Court to reconsider that ruling, but provides no additional evidence or reasoning to support the motion. In fact, it appears that the motion simply rehashes the same contentions in his original motion for recusal, which the Court rejected in its order. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in the Court's previous order (Doc. No. 81), the motion (Doc. No. 84) is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to Petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
