BOYKIN ANCHOR COMPANY, INC. v. WONG, 5:10-CV-591-FL. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120222b90
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before this court on Plaintiffs motion to seal [DE-97] its memorandum of law [DE-96]. No objection to the motion has been filed and the time for responding to the motion has expired. According to Plaintiffs motion, the materials sought to be placed under seal include materials subject to the protective order entered in this case or materials which provide a detailed description of such materials. In its review of the materials sough
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before this court on Plaintiffs motion to seal [DE-97] its memorandum of law [DE-96]. No objection to the motion has been filed and the time for responding to the motion has expired. According to Plaintiffs motion, the materials sought to be placed under seal include materials subject to the protective order entered in this case or materials which provide a detailed description of such materials. In its review of the materials sought..
More
ORDER
ROBERT B. JONES, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before this court on Plaintiffs motion to seal [DE-97] its memorandum of law [DE-96]. No objection to the motion has been filed and the time for responding to the motion has expired.
According to Plaintiffs motion, the materials sought to be placed under seal include materials subject to the protective order entered in this case or materials which provide a detailed description of such materials. In its review of the materials sought to be sealed, the court finds that because the documents at issue contain proprietary, confidential and sensitive business information, the common law presumption of access is overcome. The court finds further that there are no adequate alternatives to sealing these documents which will properly protect the confidential information contained therein.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion is ALLOWED, The documents filed at DE-96 shall be remain under seal.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle