Maes v. Hershey Company, 1:17-cv-000988 KG/LF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20181108l09
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Motion of the Parties, to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant The Hershey Company with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2), the Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS that the Motion is well taken. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Complaint against The Hershey Company and all
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Motion of the Parties, to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant The Hershey Company with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2), the Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS that the Motion is well taken. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Complaint against The Hershey Company and all ..
More
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Motion of the Parties, to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant The Hershey Company with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2), the Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS that the Motion is well taken.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Complaint against The Hershey Company and all claims and causes of actions therein is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear their own cost and attorney fees.
Source: Leagle
