Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. Township of Waterford, 18-12319. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20191220d95 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OCTOBER 31, 2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18] NANCY G. EDMUNDS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge's October 31, 2019 report and recommendation. (ECF No. 50.) The magistrate judge recommends that the Court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party filed objections to the magistrate jud
More

ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OCTOBER 31, 2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18]

Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge's October 31, 2019 report and recommendation. (ECF No. 50.) The magistrate judge recommends that the Court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter." Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss. It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer