Klass v. U.S., 11 Cr. 893 (PAC) (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20180413837
Visitors: 37
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY , District Judge . On March 6, 2018, the Court issued an opinion and order denying Petitioner Klass's Section 2255 petition. See Case No. 17 Civ. 2896, ECF 12. The Court hereby denies a Certificate of Appealability for the March 6, 2018 opinion. Klass has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). No "reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition sho
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY , District Judge . On March 6, 2018, the Court issued an opinion and order denying Petitioner Klass's Section 2255 petition. See Case No. 17 Civ. 2896, ECF 12. The Court hereby denies a Certificate of Appealability for the March 6, 2018 opinion. Klass has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). No "reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition shou..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge.
On March 6, 2018, the Court issued an opinion and order denying Petitioner Klass's Section 2255 petition. See Case No. 17 Civ. 2896, ECF 12. The Court hereby denies a Certificate of Appealability for the March 6, 2018 opinion. Klass has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). No "reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
