U.S. v. Brown, 3:14-CR-00147-RJC-DCK. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190702b15
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 82). The defendant seeks redaction of his Presentence Report (PSR) of "any such information by which Petitioner might be barred or prevented from getting the credit and time off as a reward for successful completion of the R-DAP (`Residential Drug Treatment') Program." ( Id. at 1). The motion does not
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 82). The defendant seeks redaction of his Presentence Report (PSR) of "any such information by which Petitioner might be barred or prevented from getting the credit and time off as a reward for successful completion of the R-DAP (`Residential Drug Treatment') Program." ( Id. at 1). The motion does not d..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 82).
The defendant seeks redaction of his Presentence Report (PSR) of "any such information by which Petitioner might be barred or prevented from getting the credit and time off as a reward for successful completion of the R-DAP (`Residential Drug Treatment') Program." (Id. at 1). The motion does not detail the specific information at issue, nor does it allege any information in the PSR is inaccurate. Additionally, Rule 60(b) does not provide a way to challenge the PSR in this criminal case. United States v. Jones, 730 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998) ("Rule 60(b) simply does not provide relief from judgment in a criminal case.")).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion, (Doc. No. 82), is DISMISSED.
The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this Order to the defendant and the United States Attorney.
Source: Leagle
