LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant's motion to dismiss (DE 7), and upon plaintiff's correspondence directed to the court, including document filed September 7, 2017, requesting extension of time or in the alternative voluntary dismissal without prejudice (DE 16).
Plaintiffs commenced this action pro se asserting that defendant violated "federal law" based upon the following allegations:
(Compl. at 2). Plaintiffs seek the following relief: Entry of judgment for plaintiff for damages to recover for expenses incurred for transportation costs, accommodation costs, food expenses, luggage expenses costs to replace clothes, costs for transportation, wasted vacation pay and lost wages. Recover damages for emotional distress.
(
Plaintiffs sought, and the court granted, two extensions of time to file a response to the instant motion to dismiss, with latest response due September 13, 2017. On September 7, 2017, plaintiffs filed a document expressing appreciation for extensions of time, asking for advice on whether they can represent themselves as they have not been able to obtain or afford a lawyer, and, in the event dismissal is required, asking for dismissal without prejudice so that they can refile in a small claims court. On September 13, 2017, plaintiffs delivered to the court, but the court has not filed, an additional letter requesting extension of time and an additional letter requesting voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
The court does not reach at this juncture the merits of defendant's motion to dismiss, in light of plaintiffs' requests for extension of time and for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. Due to the nature of the documents plaintiffs filed and delivered to the court, the court DIRECTS the clerk to designate the document filed September 7, 2017, as a motion for extension of time or, in the alternative, motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. The court DIRECTS the clerk to file the letters delivered September 13, 2017, combined, as a motion for extension of time or, in the alternative, motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
In light of all the circumstances presented, including the nature and form of the complaint, the arguments raised by defendant in moving to dismiss, and plaintiffs' expressed inability to gather a response thereto, the court in its discretion DENIES plaintiffs' motions for further extension of time. However, voluntary dismissal without prejudice is appropriate under the circumstances. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action by filing "a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment," as is the case here. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Such a dismissal is without prejudice.
Based on the foregoing, the court DIRECTS the clerk to designate the document filed September 7, 2017, (DE 16), as a motion for extension of time or, in the alternative, motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. The court DIRECTS the clerk to file the letters delivered September 13, 2017, combined, as a motion for extension of time or, in the alternative, motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. So construed, plaintiffs' motions for extension are DENIED and plaintiffs' motions for voluntary dismissal without prejudice are GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (DE 7) is DENIED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.