Filed: Nov. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is a "Motion to Dismiss Complaint" filed by the United States. (Doc. No. 16). In the motion, the United States represents it has concluded insufficient evidence exists to demonstrate, beyond a reasonable doubt, the Defendant engaged in terrorizing. Under F.R.Crim.P. 48(a), the "government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint." After consideration, the court grants this leave and GRANTS
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is a "Motion to Dismiss Complaint" filed by the United States. (Doc. No. 16). In the motion, the United States represents it has concluded insufficient evidence exists to demonstrate, beyond a reasonable doubt, the Defendant engaged in terrorizing. Under F.R.Crim.P. 48(a), the "government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint." After consideration, the court grants this leave and GRANTS ..
More
ORDER
CHARLES S. MILLER, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is a "Motion to Dismiss Complaint" filed by the United States. (Doc. No. 16). In the motion, the United States represents it has concluded insufficient evidence exists to demonstrate, beyond a reasonable doubt, the Defendant engaged in terrorizing. Under F.R.Crim.P. 48(a), the "government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint." After consideration, the court grants this leave and GRANTS the current motion. (Doc. No. 16). The complaint in this matter is dismissed and the Defendant is hereby discharged from the conditions of his supervised release. (Doc. No. 13).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
