RUDISILL v. U.S., 1:01-cr-00048-MR-9. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150611c13
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance [Doc. 5]. Petitioner's counsel consents to the Government's motion. For the reasons stated in the Government's motion, and in light of Petitioner's consent thereto, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion [Doc. 5] is GRANTED , and this case shall be held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit's resolution of United States v. Surratt , No. 14-685
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance [Doc. 5]. Petitioner's counsel consents to the Government's motion. For the reasons stated in the Government's motion, and in light of Petitioner's consent thereto, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion [Doc. 5] is GRANTED , and this case shall be held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit's resolution of United States v. Surratt , No. 14-6851..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance [Doc. 5]. Petitioner's counsel consents to the Government's motion.
For the reasons stated in the Government's motion, and in light of Petitioner's consent thereto,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's Motion [Doc. 5] is GRANTED, and this case shall be held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit's resolution of United States v. Surratt, No. 14-6851. The Government shall have forty-five (45) days from the issuance of the Fourth Circuit's mandate in Surratt within which to file its response to the Petitioner's motion to vacate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
