Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anderson v. Osborne, 17 CV 539 (VB). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200213b00 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER VINCENT L. BRICCETTI , District Judge . The Court held an on-the-record conference today at which plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel appeared in person. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants' motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff from raising a Fourth Amendment claim at trial. 2. Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED AS MOOT inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff's use at trial of documents respecting his disciplinar
More

ORDER

The Court held an on-the-record conference today at which plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel appeared in person. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendants' motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff from raising a Fourth Amendment claim at trial.

2. Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED AS MOOT inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff's use at trial of documents respecting his disciplinary appeal, Article 78 proceeding, and grievance submissions. The parties resolved at the conference this portion of defendants' motion.

3. Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff from presenting certain exhibits or documents at trial. Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to provide defense counsel a detailed list containing all exhibits plaintiff intends to present at trial.

4. The clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #128).

5. Jury selection and trial is scheduled for February 10, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer