SAYMAN v. GODDARD & PETERSON, PLLC, 15-1313. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150622085
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Robert W. Sayman appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sayman v. Goddard & Peterson, PLLC, No. 3:14-cv-00426-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Robert W. Sayman appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sayman v. Goddard & Peterson, PLLC, No. 3:14-cv-00426-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Robert W. Sayman appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sayman v. Goddard & Peterson, PLLC, No. 3:14-cv-00426-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
