Searcy v. City of New York, 18cv8488 (JGK). (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20181217b51
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL , District Judge . On October 30, 2018, the plaintiff obtained a certificate of default against defendant Isidore Garcia. By letter dated November 7, 2018, defendant Garcia requested that the Court vacate the certificate of default and grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. Defendant Garcia advises that he believed that his union was going to provide counsel to represent him in this action, and only recently discovered that
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL , District Judge . On October 30, 2018, the plaintiff obtained a certificate of default against defendant Isidore Garcia. By letter dated November 7, 2018, defendant Garcia requested that the Court vacate the certificate of default and grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. Defendant Garcia advises that he believed that his union was going to provide counsel to represent him in this action, and only recently discovered that ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.
On October 30, 2018, the plaintiff obtained a certificate of default against defendant Isidore Garcia. By letter dated November 7, 2018, defendant Garcia requested that the Court vacate the certificate of default and grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. Defendant Garcia advises that he believed that his union was going to provide counsel to represent him in this action, and only recently discovered that such representation will not be provided. Defendant Garcia will now be proceeding pro se.
"[A]s a general rule a district court should grant a default judgment sparingly and grant leave to set aside the entry of default freely when the defaulting party is appearing pro se." Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993). Therefore, the certificate of default is vacated, (Dkt. No. 13), and the motion for default judgment is denied, (Dkt. No. 21).
Defendant Garcia's request for an extension of time to answer the complaint is granted. The defendant may answer the complaint by January 13, 2019.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
