U.S. v. GRAHAM, 11-6220. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110524176
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 24, 2011
Latest Update: May 24, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Carl Kotay Graham appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham , No. 1:06-cr-00267-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2011). We deny Graham's motion to hold his appeal in abeyance and to appoint counsel. We dis
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Carl Kotay Graham appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham , No. 1:06-cr-00267-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2011). We deny Graham's motion to hold his appeal in abeyance and to appoint counsel. We disp..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carl Kotay Graham appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham, No. 1:06-cr-00267-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2011). We deny Graham's motion to hold his appeal in abeyance and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
