U.S. v. Dean, 3:95-cr-00031-MOC. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160509a12
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 06, 2016
Latest Update: May 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's Order resolving his Amendment 782 motion. Close review of that motion reveals that defendant may instead be contesting how the Bureau of Prisons is implementing the court's sentence as amended. If that is the case, then defendant would need to file his motion in the district of confinement, not this court, under 2241. Having considered defendant's motion a
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's Order resolving his Amendment 782 motion. Close review of that motion reveals that defendant may instead be contesting how the Bureau of Prisons is implementing the court's sentence as amended. If that is the case, then defendant would need to file his motion in the district of confinement, not this court, under 2241. Having considered defendant's motion an..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's Order resolving his Amendment 782 motion. Close review of that motion reveals that defendant may instead be contesting how the Bureau of Prisons is implementing the court's sentence as amended. If that is the case, then defendant would need to file his motion in the district of confinement, not this court, under § 2241. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the government file a Response to defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's Order resolving his Amendment 782 motion (#406) within 14 days.
Source: Leagle
