Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Way v. Berryhill, 1:17CV192. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180402d52 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On February 22, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 18) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Defendant filed a response (Doc. 19). The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 1
More

ORDER

On February 22, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 18) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Defendant filed a response (Doc. 19).

The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 16), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 7) is DENIED, that the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer