Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RYAN AND ANDRUS PERSONAL PROPERTY, 4:13-CV-4-D. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20130827e47 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2013
Summary: DEFAULT JUDGMENT JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. It appearing that a copy of the Complaint herein was served upon the potential claimant of the defendants and that publication has been duly made, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4), and, thus, that due notice was given accordingly, the Court finds that: 1. Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendants were duly seized by the Bureau of Alcohol, To
More

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. It appearing that a copy of the Complaint herein was served upon the potential claimant of the defendants and that publication has been duly made, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4), and, thus, that due notice was given accordingly, the Court finds that:

1. Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendants were duly seized by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives pursuant to said process;

2. No entitled persons have filed any claim to the defendants nor answer regarding them within the time fixed by law; and

3. The well-plead allegations of the Complaint in respect to the defendants are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared to deny the same.

Based upon the above findings, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Default judgment be and the same is hereby entered against the defendants;

2. All persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or to the said defendants are held in default;

3. The defendants are forfeited to the United States of America;

4. This Court entered Default in this action at Docket Entry # /0; and

5. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is hereby directed to dispose of the defendants according to law, including destruction.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer