U.S. v. Roney, 1:16 CR 39-2. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180302c64
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's "Pro Se Notice to Produce Proof of Entry of Attorney Appearance" [256]. Upon review of the Notice, the Court finds the pleading is baseless and the request without any legal reason or cause. The Court further finds the Notice frivolous. See Adams v. Rice , 40 F.3d 72 , 75 (4th Cir. 1994) ("Legally frivolous claims are based on an "indisputably meritless legal theory" and including "claims of infri
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's "Pro Se Notice to Produce Proof of Entry of Attorney Appearance" [256]. Upon review of the Notice, the Court finds the pleading is baseless and the request without any legal reason or cause. The Court further finds the Notice frivolous. See Adams v. Rice , 40 F.3d 72 , 75 (4th Cir. 1994) ("Legally frivolous claims are based on an "indisputably meritless legal theory" and including "claims of infrin..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's "Pro Se Notice to Produce Proof of Entry of Attorney Appearance" [256]. Upon review of the Notice, the Court finds the pleading is baseless and the request without any legal reason or cause. The Court further finds the Notice frivolous. See Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 75 (4th Cir. 1994) ("Legally frivolous claims are based on an "indisputably meritless legal theory" and including "claims of infringement of a legal interest which clearly does not exist."") (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989)).
Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Notice [# 256] from the docket.
Source: Leagle
